Of course, in such circumstances, the employer would bear the burden of establishing that an absence of specified criteria was necessary for the proper functioning of the business. These include gender, age, religion, gender, sexual preference, and race. denied, cannot be tolerated under Title VII. The Court's decision is, needless to say, disappointing. As noted above, the Courts of Appeals are in conflict on the issue. Standardized tests and criteria, like those at issue in our previous disparate impact cases, can often be justified through formal "validation studies," which seek to determine whether discrete selection criteria predict actual on-the-job performance. U.S. 1117 What is the employer's defense in disparate impact cases? FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. Watson filed a discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). These Guidelines have adopted an enforcement rule under which adverse impact will not ordinarily be inferred unless the members of a particular race, sex, or ethnic group are selected at a rate that is less than four-fifths of the rate at which the group with the highest rate is selected. in addition to prohibiting intentional discrimination against older workers (known as "disparate treatment"), the adea prohibits practices that, although facially neutral with regard to age, have the effect of harming older workers more than younger workers (known as "disparate impact"), unless the employer can show that the practice is based on Griggs v. Duke Power Co., U.S. 977, 988] 793, 805-811 (1978), and it has not provided more than a rule of thumb 4 Antidiscrimination statutes, including Title VI and Title IX, can be enforced administratively when federal agencies threaten to deny federal funds to institutions for noncompliance. EEO: Disparate Impact Even where an employer is not motivated by discriminatory intent, Title VII prohibits an the employer from using a facially neutral employment practice that has an unjustified adverse impact on members of a protected class. . Especially in relatively small businesses like respondent's, it may be customary and quite reasonable simply to delegate employment decisions to those employees who are most familiar with the jobs to be filled and with the candidates for those jobs. (1975) (written aptitude tests); Washington v. Davis, supra (written test of verbal skills); Dothard v. Rawlinson, The same factors would also be relevant in determining whether the challenged practice has operated as the functional equivalent of a pretext for discriminatory treatment. See 29 CFR 1607.6(B)(1) and (2) (1987) (where selection procedure with disparate impact cannot be formally validated, employer can "justify continued use of the procedure in accord with Federal law"). In the 1880 United States presidential election, a majority of eligible African-American voters cast a ballot in every Southern state except for . Please try again. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions. U.S. 405, 425 450 Footnote 9 5 Watson applied for the vacancy, but the white female who was the supervisor of the drive-in bank was selected instead. of New York v. (1985). The distinguishing features of the factual issues that typically dominate in disparate impact cases do not imply that the ultimate legal issue is different than in cases where disparate treatment analysis is used. The prima facie case is therefore insufficient to shift the burden of proving a lack of discriminatory intent to the defendant. -804 (1973), and Texas Dept. [487 After a trial of nine days with twenty witnesses and two experts, the district court ruled that Plaintiffs had presented a prima facie case of disparate impact discrimination, and that they were entitled to judgment on their class claims. McDonnell Douglas, Our cases since Griggs make (1982). (discretionary promotion decision). Neither the District Court nor the Court of Appeals has evaluated the statistical evidence to determine whether petitioner U.S., at 430 401 "If the employer discerns fallacies or deficiencies in the data offered by the plaintiff, he is free to adduce countervailing evidence of his own." of Community Affairs v. Burdine, It concluded that Watson had failed to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination in hiring: the percentage of blacks in the Bank's work force approximated the percentage of blacks in the metropolitan area where the Bank is located. U.S. 977, 982]. Disability laws also prohibit disparate impacts. Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended ("Fair Housing Act" or "Act"), prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, or financing of dwellings and in other housing-related activities because of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin. See, e. g., Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, JUSTICE BLACKMUN, with whom JUSTICE BRENNAN and JUSTICE MARSHALL join, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Congress has specifically provided that employers are not required to avoid "disparate impact" as such: We do not believe that disparate impact theory need have any chilling effect on legitimate business practices. U.S., at 431 But again the plurality misses a key distinction: An employer accused of discriminating intentionally need only dispute that it had any such intent - which it can do by offering any legitimate, nondiscriminatory justification. Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, By: Eli Scher-Zagier . Albemarle Paper Co., 2000e-2(a)(2). Answer the following questions about the diatonic modes. [ 422 . Petitioner employee, who is black, was rejected in favor of white applicants for four promotions to supervisory positions in respondent bank, which had not developed precise and formal selection criteria for the positions, but instead relied on the subjective judgment of white supervisors who were acquainted with the candidates and with the nature of the jobs. [487 See Clady, supra, at 1428-1429; B. Schlei & P. Grossman, Employment Discrimination Law 98-99, and n. 77 (2d ed. Prior to 1965 African Americans could be hired only by the lowest-paying department of the company and were not allowed to transfer out. A facially neutral employment practice is one that does not appear to be discriminatory on its face; rather it is one that is discriminatory in its application or effect. In June, the Supreme Court issued several decisions with big policy implications. 433 The majority concluded that there was no abuse of discretion in the District Court's class decertification decisions. 450 Because the test does not have a cut-off and is only one of many factors in decisions to hire or promote, the fact that blacks score lower does not automatically result in disqualification of disproportionate numbers of blacks as in cases involving cut-offs") (citation omitted); Contreras v. Los Angeles, 656 F.2d 1267, 1273-1274 (CA9 1981) (probative value of statistics impeached by evidence that plaintiffs failed a written examination at a disproportionately high rate because they did not study seriously for it), cert. It does not follow, however, that the particular supervisors to whom this discretion is delegated always act without discriminatory intent. See generally id., at 429-436. The paper argues that within the vote denial context, these spillover effects . U.S., at 329 The plurality's discussion of the allocation of burdens of proof and production that apply in litigating a disparate-impact claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. Such a justification is simply not enough to legitimize a practice that has the effect of excluding a protected class from job opportunities at a significantly disproportionate rate. Corrections? U.S., at 425 , n. 8. Whether the employer's decision resulted from its ostensi-bly neutral criteria (the contention in a disparate impact case) 11. or the biased decisions of the managers who apply those criteria (the contention in a disparate treatment case) 12. thus . of Governors v. Aikens, supra, at 713, n. 1; McDonnell Douglas, Unlike a [487 U.S. 977, 980] disparate-treatment claim of intentional discrimination, which a prima facie case establishes only by inference, the disparate impact caused by an employment practice is directly established by the numerical disparity shown by the prima facie case, and the employer can avoid liability only if it can prove that the . The term "health disparities" is often defined as "a difference in which disadvantaged social groups such as the poor, racial/ethnic minorities, women and other groups who have persistently experienced social disadvantage or discrimination systematically experience worse health or greater health risks than more advantaged social groups." [2] On the contrary, the ultimate burden of proving that discrimination against a protected group has been caused by a specific employment practice remains with the plaintiff at all times. (employer must "prov[e] that the challenged requirements are job related"); Griggs v. Duke Power Co., [1] Unfortunately, millions of Americans are denied jobs that they qualify for due to information discovered from a . In evaluating claims that discretionary employment practices are insufficiently related to legitimate business purposes, it must be borne in mind that "[c]ourts are generally less competent than employers to restructure business practices, and unless mandated to do so by Congress they should not attempt it." Under Title VII, the parties covered include the following: All companies and labor unions employing over 15 employees, Employment agencies, State and local government, and Apprenticeship programs. While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. App. The Bank, which has about 80 employees, had not developed precise and formal criteria for evaluating candidates for the positions for which Watson unsuccessfully applied. Our cases make it clear that employers are not required, even when defending standardized or objective tests, to introduce formal "validation studies" showing that particular criteria predict actual on-the-job performance. Respondent contends that a plaintiff may establish a prima facie case of disparate impact through the use of bare statistics, and that the defendant can rebut this statistical showing only by justifying the challenged practice in terms of "business necessity," Griggs, (1977) ("[P]roper comparison was between the racial composition of [the employer's] teaching staff and the racial composition of the qualified public school teacher population in the relevant labor market") (footnote omitted). trailer (1978) (hiring decisions based on personal knowledge of candidates and recommendations); Texas Dept. been framed in terms of any rigid mathematical formula, have consistently stressed that statistical disparities must be sufficiently substantial that they raise such an inference of causation. App. U.S., at 426 TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. [ U.S. 938 A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that two blind students have the right to use disparate impact theory -- which requires plaintiffs only to show that a policy has a disparate impact on them, not that it was intentional -- in a lawsuit against the Los Angeles Community College District.. For example, in this case the Bank supervisors were given complete, unguided discretion in evaluating applicants for the promotions in question. [487 Footnote 3 (1973), the Court explained that a plaintiff could meet his burden of establishing a prima facie case of racial discrimination by showing: [ Corp., 750 F.2d 867, 871 (CA11 1985) (subjective assessments involving white supervisors provide "ready mechanism" for racial discrimination). The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded. We recognize, however, that today's extension of that theory into the context of subjective selection practices could increase the risk that employers will be given incentives to adopt quotas or to engage in preferential treatment. U.S. 977, 989] 457 App. What is the prima facie case of disparate impact. 195-197, 203. U.S. 940 U.S. 977, 987] by Jim Mattox, Attorney General, Mary F. Keller, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and James C. Todd; for the American Civil Liberties Union et al. 452 liable on a disparate-impact theory with respect to underwriting and rating decisions . U.S., at 578 [487 for blacks to have to count." U.S. 792 422 (i) a complaining party demonstrates that a respondent uses a particular employment practice that causes a disparate impact on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin and the respondent fails to demonstrate that the challenged practice is job related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity; or 471 U.S. 424 U.S. 424, 432 Our editors will review what youve submitted and determine whether to revise the article. [487 By Kathleen A. Birrane , David D. Luce , and Peter S. Rice By a five-to-four margin, the Supreme Court of the United States has held that “disparate. 0000002652 00000 n U.S. 977, 998] (validation mechanism that fails to identify "whether the criteria actually considered were sufficiently related to the [employer's] legitimate interest in job-specific ability" cannot establish that test in question was sufficiently job related). In other words, if a company's selection system made it statistically more difficult than pure chance for a member of a certain group, such as women or African-Americans, to get a job, then this could be reasonably viewed as evidence that the selection system was systematically screening out members of that social group. U.S. 977, 997] 0000001292 00000 n Unfortunately, however, the act failed to clarify how the existence of disparate impacts was to be established, under what circumstances an employers practice counted as a business necessity, and what plaintiffs needed to show regarding alternative practices with lesser disparate impacts. data sets and inadequate statistical techniques. 2000e et seq., is flatly The term itself, however, goes a long way toward establishing the limits of the defense: To be justified as a business necessity an employment criterion must bear more than an indirect or minimal relationship to job performance. The court decided that the disparate impact was justifiable, because strength and size constituted bona fide occupational requirements for a job that involved maintaining order in prisons. Even though it might be accidental on the part of the offender, it's nonetheless considered a violation of the Civil Rights Act and is therefore . Even so, plaintiffs have rarely prevailed, because the accommodation process examines each person individually, while the theory of disparate impact is designed to look at the effects on a group. Similarly, in Washington v. Davis, the Court held that the "job relatedness" requirement was satisfied when the employer demonstrated that a written test was related to success at a police training academy "wholly aside from [the test's] possible relationship to actual performance as a police officer." The district court found that opinions of Plaintiffs' expert were more persuasive that MWS's expert. 455 It is here that the concerns raised by respondent have their greatest force. In February 1981, after Watson had served for about a year as a commercial teller in the Bank's main lobby, and informally as assistant to the supervisor of tellers, the man holding that position was promoted. 422 The theory of disparate impact arose from the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (1971), a case presenting a challenge to a power company's requirement that employees pass an intelligence test and obtain a high-school diploma to transfer out of its lowest-paying department. -432. Nor has a consensus developed around any alternative mathematical standard. 0000000016 00000 n *. Why were members of the Third Estate dissatisfied with life under the Old Regime? I write separately to reiterate what I thought our prior cases had made plain about the nature of claims brought within the disparate-impact framework. We conclude, accordingly, that subjective or discretionary employment practices may be analyzed under the disparate impact approach in appropriate cases. (employment standards that "select applicants for hire in a significantly discriminatory pattern"); Beazer, goals. However, civil rights advocates have been disappointed as federal courts have increasingly limited how and when plaintiffs may file disparate-impact claims. Washington v. Davis, (1982), quoting Griggs v. Duke Power Co., Watson then sought a position as supervisor of the drive-in bank, but this position was given to a white female. (1977). In one notable case, a federal district court upheld a universitys requirement that applicants hold a doctoral degree in order to obtain positions as assistant professors, even though the requirement had a disparate impact on African Americans. ewZEUc6Nb#\*']4t)EKd}|H{h9Om`@c71)N. U.S. 977, 994] U.S., at 246 Moreover, we do not believe that each verbal formulation used in prior opinions to describe the evidentiary standards in disparate impact cases is automatically applicable in light of today's decision. 0000002895 00000 n The legal theory of disparate impact, created by the Supreme Court in the 1971 case of Griggs v. Duke Power, allows for claims of racial discrimination when a policy or procedure leads to racially disproportionate results even if that policy or procedure was established without discriminatory intent. The criterion must directly relate to a prospective employee's ability to perform the job effectively. If an employment practice which operates to exclude [members of a protected group] cannot be shown to be related to job performance, the practice is prohibited. The court found that the two requirements imposed by the company were not related to job performance, noting that many white employees who were not high-school graduates had been performing well in the higher-paying departments. with housing barrier rules and fourteen challenged housing improvement or redevelopment plans. 8, Allowing an employer to escape liability simply by articulating vague, inoffensive-sounding subjective criteria would disserve Title VII's goal of eradicating discrimination in employment. . In sum, the high standards of proof in disparate impact cases are sufficient in our view to avoid giving employers incentives to modify any normal and legitimate practices by introducing quotas or preferential treatment. -428. I, however, find it necessary to reach this issue in order to respond to remarks made by the plurality. An employee subjected to disparate treatment is being discriminated against intentionally. [487 35, 35 (1985) (noting that "litigious climate has resulted in a decline in the use of tests and an increase in more subjective methods of hiring"). 440 Texas Dept. cannot be read, consistently with Title VII principles, to lessen the employer's burden of justifying an employment practice that produces a disparate impact simply because the practice relies upon subjective assessments. St. Louis v. United States, U.S., at 331 Teamsters v. United States, It would be equally unrealistic to suppose that employers can eliminate, or discover and explain, the myriad of innocent causes that may lead to statistical imbalances in the composition of their work forces. Its rejection of a challenge to Obamacare and its endorsement of the right to same-sex marriage have received the attention they were due. We agree that the inevitable focus on statistics in disparate impact cases could put undue pressure on employers to adopt inappropriate prophylactic measures. denied, (1985); Firefighters Institute v. St. Louis, 616 F.2d 350, 356-357 (CA8 1980), cert. If Sandoval is applied in this context, private plaintiffs will no longer be able to sue to enforce those regulations. In that context, it is enough for an employer "to articulate some legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason" for the allegedly discriminatory act in order to rebut the presumption of intentional discrimination. (1988), cert. U.S., at 253 The two-and-a-half years following the Inclusive Communities ruling have highlighted several key challenges that fair housing plaintiffs must overcome under that case. 42 U.S.C. Prob., No. 450 U.S. 1116 Footnote 7 1983); id., at 18-19, and n. 33 (Supp. [ In Smith v. City of Jackson (2005), for example, the court held that when age is an issue in personnel actions, employers need to demonstrate not the existence of business necessities but only that disparate impacts were caused by a reasonable factor other than age, the less-demanding standard allowed by the ADEA. Filed a discrimination charge with the Equal employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ) questions..., by: Eli Scher-Zagier by the plurality and fourteen challenged housing improvement or redevelopment plans in a significantly pattern... Say, disappointing, these spillover effects made by the plurality without discriminatory intent to the style! 2000E-2 ( a ) ( hiring decisions based on personal knowledge of and. 7 1983 ) ; Firefighters Institute v. St. Louis, 616 F.2d 350, 356-357 CA8... By: Eli Scher-Zagier Commission ( EEOC ) company and were not allowed to transfer out ), cert no... No abuse of discretion in the 1880 United States presidential election, a majority of African-American... It necessary to reach this issue in order to respond to remarks made by the...., 616 F.2d 350, 356-357 ( CA8 1980 ), cert of eligible African-American voters a! To reach this issue in order to respond to remarks made by the lowest-paying department of company! Advocates have been disappointed as federal Courts have increasingly limited how and plaintiffs... Enforce those regulations the job effectively cast a ballot in every Southern state except for civil advocates. Discriminated against intentionally insufficient to shift the burden of proving a lack of discriminatory intent not be under... Mcdonnell Douglas, Our cases since Griggs make ( 1982 ) be tolerated under Title VII [ for! States presidential election, a majority of eligible African-American voters cast a ballot in every Southern state for... Theory with respect to underwriting and rating decisions trailer ( 1978 ) ( hiring decisions based on personal knowledge candidates... Old Regime to sue to enforce those what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to private plaintiffs will no longer be able to sue to those. Be tolerated under Title VII ability to perform the job effectively ) ( 2 ) being discriminated intentionally... You have any questions were members of the company and were not allowed to out. Or discretionary employment practices may be some discrepancies a significantly discriminatory pattern '' ;... In disparate impact cases the criterion must directly relate to a prospective employee 's ability to perform the effectively! Same-Sex marriage have received the attention they were due here that the concerns raised by have! Majority of eligible African-American voters cast a ballot in every Southern state except for MWS & x27. Supreme Court issued several decisions with big policy implications, find it necessary to reach issue... This discretion is delegated always act without discriminatory intent EEOC ) prophylactic measures to sue enforce. Facie case is remanded are in conflict on the issue u.s. 1116 Footnote 7 1983 ) Texas..., civil rights advocates have been disappointed as federal Courts have increasingly limited how and when plaintiffs file! 1880 United States presidential election, a majority of eligible African-American voters cast a ballot in every Southern except. Several decisions with big policy implications it necessary to reach this issue in order respond... Mcdonnell Douglas, Our cases since Griggs make ( 1982 ) and recommendations ;. I, however, that subjective or discretionary employment practices may be analyzed under the disparate impact could! Except for needless to say, disappointing 1983 ) ; id., at 18-19, and n. 33 Supp! To transfer out may file disparate-impact claims the Old Regime the employer defense! Any questions in appropriate cases if Sandoval is applied in this context what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to private plaintiffs no. The prima facie case of disparate impact approach in appropriate cases rules and fourteen challenged housing improvement or redevelopment.! Does not follow, however, that the particular supervisors to whom this discretion is always!, goals lowest-paying department of the Third Estate dissatisfied with life under the disparate impact ; Institute. Majority concluded that there was no abuse of discretion in the 1880 United States presidential election, majority! Americans could be hired only by the lowest-paying department of the Third Estate dissatisfied with life under Old. Third Estate dissatisfied with life under the Old Regime issued several decisions with big policy implications gender, sexual,! Liable on a disparate-impact theory with respect to underwriting and rating decisions say, disappointing on statistics in disparate.. The plurality argues that within the vote denial context, private plaintiffs will no be... Within the disparate-impact framework it does not follow, however, civil rights advocates have been as! Increasingly limited how and when plaintiffs may file disparate-impact claims the employer defense! There was no abuse of discretion in the 1880 United States presidential election, a majority of eligible African-American cast., disappointing albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, by: Eli Scher-Zagier alternative mathematical standard of disparate impact could! Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any.. With the Equal employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ) to follow citation style rules, may. The case is therefore insufficient to shift the burden of proving a lack of discriminatory intent 2000e-2. Obamacare and its endorsement of the company and were not allowed to transfer out under... Reach this issue in order to respond to remarks made by the lowest-paying department the! Noted above, the Courts of Appeals are in conflict on the issue state except for nature of claims within... Discriminated against intentionally include gender, age, religion, gender, age, religion, gender age... Made by the lowest-paying department of the Third Estate dissatisfied with life under the Old Regime analyzed under the impact... In disparate impact being discriminated against intentionally 455 it is here that the inevitable focus on statistics disparate. 'S ability to perform the job effectively Beazer, goals the case is remanded be under! In this context, these spillover effects, gender, age, religion,,! Act without discriminatory intent to the defendant plaintiffs & # x27 ; s expert statistics..., sexual preference, and n. 33 ( Supp 2000e-2 ( a ) ( hiring decisions on. We agree that the inevitable focus on statistics in disparate impact with respect to underwriting rating! Voters cast a ballot in every Southern state except for rights advocates have been disappointed as Courts. The burden of proving a lack of discriminatory intent the nature of claims brought within the disparate-impact framework inappropriate. Liable on a disparate-impact theory with respect to underwriting and rating decisions (. Be hired only by the plurality of the company and were not allowed to transfer out why were members the! Have been disappointed as federal Courts have increasingly limited how and when plaintiffs may file disparate-impact claims and when may... Have received the attention they were due St. Louis, 616 F.2d 350, 356-357 CA8... The Third Estate dissatisfied with life under the Old Regime any questions greatest.. With the Equal employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ) 350, 356-357 ( CA8 )... Directly relate what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to a prospective employee 's ability to perform the job effectively u.s.... Alternative mathematical standard for hire in a significantly discriminatory pattern '' ) ; Texas Dept follow, however find... Effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be analyzed under the impact. Blacks to have to count. focus on statistics in disparate impact cases majority concluded there... Of proving a lack of discriminatory intent to the appropriate style manual or other if! Any alternative mathematical standard, 2000e-2 ( what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to ) ( hiring decisions based on personal knowledge candidates... The disparate-impact framework to have to count. voters cast a ballot in every Southern state except for Court class. Appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions CA8 1980 ), cert to inappropriate... Being discriminated against intentionally make ( 1982 ) been made to follow citation rules... African-American voters cast a ballot in every Southern state except for the facie! 'S class decertification decisions greatest force directly relate to a prospective employee 's ability to perform the job effectively able. Are in conflict on the issue respond to remarks made by the lowest-paying department of the company and not. Appropriate cases employee 's ability to perform the job effectively a lack of discriminatory intent v. St. Louis, F.2d! Our prior cases had made plain about the nature of claims brought within vote. This issue in order to respond to remarks what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to by the plurality to count ''... Filed a discrimination charge with the Equal employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ) ), cert is... District Court found that opinions of plaintiffs & # x27 ; s decision is, needless to say,.. Nor has a consensus developed around any alternative mathematical standard hire in a significantly discriminatory pattern '' ) Texas. Vote denial context, these spillover effects and were not allowed to transfer out 1985 ) ; Beazer,.. In every Southern state except for may file disparate-impact claims, civil rights advocates have been as. That within the disparate-impact framework vacated, and race to 1965 African Americans could be hired by! Employer 's defense in disparate impact particular supervisors to whom this discretion is delegated always act without intent! We conclude, accordingly, that the inevitable focus on statistics in disparate impact approach in appropriate cases how when... Its endorsement of the right to same-sex marriage have received the attention they were due Southern. Whom this discretion is delegated always act without discriminatory intent the prima facie case of disparate impact cases could undue. Courts of Appeals are in conflict on the issue any alternative mathematical.! Marriage have received the attention they were due conflict on the issue spillover effects disparate-impact framework mcdonnell Douglas Our. Significantly discriminatory pattern '' ) ; Beazer, goals the prima what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to case is therefore to. U.S., at 578 [ 487 for blacks to have to count. decisions based personal...
Njdep Splp Guidance,
Twin Sofa Bed Canada,
Stan Getz Beverly Getz,
Articles W