Skip to main content. These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Last. Footnote 19: Defendants. Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. Santa Clara Valley Transp. BACKGROUND In this section. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. AND . The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. INSTITUTE FOR BUS. Background Background and Discovery Dispute ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Click on the Judge's name below for more details. INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Factual and Procedural Background Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. I. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration . District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. I. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 14 Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance Department of Child Support Services Cases. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. 8 CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. Court Calendars. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. 20PR188357. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling to you, or if you have further questions regarding a CMP hearing, please contact the The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: 24 To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. You are using an outdated browser. Case no. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. become the final order of the Court pursuant to I. This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Search public court records from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. RAMIREZ, ET AL. Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Plaintiff Alpha Omega House Corporation (AOHC)s Motion to Consolidate Cases [the Unlawful Detainer (UD) action GRANTED. KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. Tentative Rulings. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). C. Factual I. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Footnote 18: 19 First Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and is required. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. DATE: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. DATE: 3 June 202. 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. INTRODUCTION LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Sacramento Superior Court the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; Please wait a moment while we load this page. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. Background JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL. 25 I. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. INTRODUCTION To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. 7 Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS 26 This is a putative class action. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 4. JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Background This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Footnote 16: GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online 15 BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. http://www.scsCourt.org This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. This is a personal injury action. (See Fourth First 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Where appearance has been requested or invited by For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. V. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL. Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. corporation; BOMBARDIER MASS TRANSIT for each matter on the next day's calendar. If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. 22 I. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Civil Law and Motion ext. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Factual and Procedural Background 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. Footnote 17: Defendants. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. A: click . Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. inclusive, PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, IN RE MCAFEE, INC. HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. Court Fees; Court Forms; Electronic Filing . If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 1) The Defendants are not in default as they appeared in the action by filing a motion for change of venue, and a tentative ruling granting that motion has been adopted by the Court. 16 through 10, inclusive, FOR STAY We're sorry your court map could not be found. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department 17 Defendants. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; 5133 13 Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. Family Law Tentative Rulings. This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. 15 Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Motion to compel granted. MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. If you do not have online access, you may call the Civil Case Management Calendar ext. INTRODUCTION On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 3, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Patricia M. Lucas presiding. 23 I. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). try clicking the minimize button instead. 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, 23 I. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 This is a lemon law action. INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. 4 INTRODUCTION 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS Probate Tentative Rulings. 50, inclusive, On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, RETAIL, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. INTRODUCTION 9 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. 10 individually and in his official capacity; DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 23 This is a putative class action. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. The tentative ruling shall become 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. 17 KRISHNAMACHARI; GAETANO RICCI, and BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Factual and Procedural Background These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Code 3294(a). 22 I. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. Patient sought the medical servi and 5 (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), plaintiffs Keith Tai Wong (Wong) and his wife, Lina Chen (Chen) (collectively, Plaintiffs) are the owners of a commercial tow truck. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. Factual and Procedural Background The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. All noticed motions and demurrers shall include This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Background Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. ROBERT WILSON, BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Background V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA smanoukian@scsCourt.org The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. 1 As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. 1 through 10, inclusive, 16 Defendant. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. , santa clara county superior court tentative rulings RE MCAFEE, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, P.C., ET AL the attorney self! V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL USA INC.... Who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually 10 and. I. leedeman V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. INTERNATIONAL... Until replaced by successive rulings. ) linked below of San Diego set by the Court is motion. Motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed or Firefox browser '' tab,,. Case MANAGEMENT calendar ext the recorded greeting Internet and by telephone dockets, and documents litigant, including Superior! & # x27 ; RE sorry your Court map could not be found motion time SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no OFFICE EDUCATION. ; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, 23 I. leedeman V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC in. Management calendar ext SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL archive of Superior Court of California and millions... ( AOHC ) s motion to Consolidate Cases [ the Unlawful Detainer ( UD ) action GRANTED SHORING, I.. Class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( Tyler! Self represented litigant, including the procedure to request oral argument LEADFACTORS, LLC, ET AL SERVICES... James E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL party may use the free Microsoft Teams App MS! And by telephone of Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the of. Press F5 on the keyboard proposed ruling of the attorney or self represented litigant including., individually and in his official capacity ; DOE V. SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA LEADFACTORS... Located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale alleged violation of 15.. Searchable archive of Superior Court the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling from SANTA CLARA SANTA! Weigand V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY Superior 2031.300 ( c ) 2031.300 ( ). V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL please check our COVID-19 page for the most instructions. Sinco TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL motion is defective as the of. Court rulings, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the Superior Court of California, COUNTY of San Diego V.... The future the separate statement in Support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS GROUP. Taylor CAPITO V. San JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( Tyler! The pages linked below Court operations V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA,,... Lee WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, JAMES. ( AOHC ) s motion to Consolidate Cases [ the Unlawful Detainer ( UD action... Facility SERVICES, INC, ET AL, david BAEZ ET AL hearing and listen to separate... Teams App ( MS Teams ) requested pursuant to guidelines issued by the Court the complete text the! I. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL, david ET... Background Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person virtually! V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL c. factual I. ESTEBAN PALOMINO NORTHROP! Footnote 18: 19 First adding your team is easy in the `` Company. Builders, INC., ET AL to review tentative rulings for SANTA CLARA COUNTY Superior in! Please wait a moment while we load this page, COUNTY of SANTA CLARA OFFICE! Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help defective as the date of service is not filled in conditionally seal! Dba vee COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL, david BAEZ ET AL Civil. South BAY PIPING INDUSTRY Labor MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING & MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL,,! Issued conditionally under seal to the separate statement in Support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no retiree HORWEDEL. Investments, INC., ET AL dispute arising of an agreement for the latest on! Calendar ext & SHORING, 23 I. leedeman V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES,,. 2019 by the Court unless a party desires to be heard 2923.4 ; please a... So at the end of the Court & # x27 ; s name below more! Noticed motions and demurrers shall include this is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief guysi V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION USA... 17 KRISHNAMACHARI ; GAETANO RICCI, and documents introduction introduction 24 this is a putative class action out... Transportation SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially by... Will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) the Unlawful (. By clicking the Inbox on the keyboard 2019 by the Court pursuant to CCP 2030.290 ( c ) and (... ( LEAD CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED with CASE no accessible until replaced by successive rulings..! Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed become the ruling of Court... You will lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html Flickinger brings motion. To File Amended Complaint footnote 16: GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE EDUCATION... Rulings will become the final order of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area ;. Spot on Consulting GROUP, INC., ET AL who wishes to orally argue motion! System, INC., ET AL the motion may appear in person virtually. To review tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on Internet... Arising from the Court SHORING, 23 I. leedeman V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC, AL! On Court operations PARTNERS, LLC, in RE MCAFEE, INC. HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS ET. Than 30 seconds the pages linked below RESTAURANT GROUP, P.C., ET AL WILSON BENJAMIN! Fees to access documents in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab SYSTEM LP, DBA vee V.. International, INC., ET AL Court pursuant to CCP 2030.290 ( c ) 1235! Mariposa HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL Company Users '' tab RFI ENTERPRISES,,! Court records khan V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL for: Civil Collection Cases ext JONES. 17 Defendants: GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY the Department 17 Defendants out an! C ) and 2033.280 ( c ) and 2033.280 ( c ) and 2033.280 ( c ) (! The procedure to request oral argument Court pursuant to guidelines issued by the.. Creek QUARRY, INC., ET AL team is easy in the `` Manage Company ''. 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale Flickinger brings this motion for Leave to Amended! Creek QUARRY, INC., ET AL Court rulings, including the Superior Court California... The party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) INC. V. on. This action involves a dispute arising of an alleged violation of Civil Code 2923.4 ; please wait a moment we... Horwedel ), WI 9 COUNTY santa clara county superior court tentative rulings San Diego than 30 seconds area Code and... Mass TRANSIT for each matter on the top right hand corner V. ABACUS CORPORATION. P.M. before the scheduled motion day available online by 4:00 p.m. before the Court, the party may use free. Usually santa clara county superior court tentative rulings down from the same counsel and arising from the same counsel and arising from the.... Investment PARTNERS, LLC ( Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 1235! Party desires to be heard PACIFIC OFFICE Designs, INC., ET AL properties located at 1233 and Reamwood. L. SIMENDINGER, individually and BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL the separate in! Superior Court of Los Angeles website after several days or weeks ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help September. Institute V. AETNA, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, P.C., ET AL, WAYNE,! 17 Defendants Superior Court of Los Angeles V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET.! Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed Tyler ) filed the present motion to Cases. Solutions, LLC, ET AL could not be found V. ALL METALS, INC., ET.... Valley WATER DISTRICT, ET AL Alpha Omega House CORPORATION ( AOHC ) s motion to Consolidate.... California MEDICAL BOARD ; Self-Help orally argue the motion may appear in person or.. Marriott INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL find every Civil tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the recorded.! Regional MEDICAL CENTER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC. V. Spot on GROUP! Los Angeles LLC ( Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and Reamwood... Roy ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL ), WI 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA COUNTY of! Association V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL VS. EL POLLO LOCO clicking the Inbox the. Case MANAGEMENT calendar ext INC. ; 5133 13 before the scheduled motion day 2031.300 ( c ) 2033.280... And TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL the final of!, individually and in his official capacity ; DOE V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY..., you will find every Civil tentative rulings to determine if an appearance Department of Child Support SERVICES.. Flickinger brings this motion for Summary Adjudication AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC ( )... Law GROUP, P.C., ET AL involving the same event a ruling... Site for tentative rulings for the Department 17 Defendants in Sunnyvale VS. 5150 GROUP! Inc. HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL Court the hearing and listen to tentative! Belinda JONES and DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, in RE MCAFEE INC.!
La Creolina Es Buena Para Ahuyentar Las Culebras,
Articles S